While working with a practice open 4 days per week, I observed the doctor had time most days to browse the Internet and meet with me during what was supposed to be time with patients. We considered 4 possible solutions:
1) Get more patients in the door
2) Perform more services per patient
3) Cut doctor hours
4) Do nothing
Although attractive, solution #1 was infeasible in the short-term because we lacked a method to bring an instantaneous flood of patients in the door. After benchmarking the doctor’s procedure frequency against other practices, we determined the doctor was performing a reasonable number of procedures per patient given his treatment philosophy and the type of practice he wanted. Further, any reasonable changes in treatment recommendations were too small to close the gap between the current hours in the office and hours needed to perform procedures. So we ruled out #2. Solution #4 was our last choice.
Through an analysis of the schedule and patient load, we determined the doctor could easily meet the patient demand for services working 3 days per week. However, the single hygienist could not handle the patient load on 3 days per week. Since the doctor had an op available for a second hygienist, we found a hygienist available to work a second hygiene room one day per week.
Outcome: The doc now works 3 days per week instead of 4 with NO decrease in production.
I've Moved
15 years ago